Short reporting for Hong Kong
Tuesday, March 2, 2010 at 6:32PM Whether Hong Kong needs it or not, and we would suggest it does not need it, short position reporting is coming to Hong Kong. The following was on the SFC website today:
SFC to adopt new short-position reporting regime
In a set of consultation conclusions released today, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) announced that after taking into account industry feedback and the domestic market situation, it will introduce a short-position reporting regime to enhance transparency of short-selling activities in Hong Kong.
The SFC received 21 responses from market participants to its 31 July 2009 consultation paper on increasing short-selling transparency which discussed two possible approaches: enhancing the existing transactional reporting regime and implementing a new short-position reporting model.
“A build-up of large short positions may be potentially disruptive to market stability,” said the SFC’s Chief Executive Officer Mr Martin Wheatley. “A short-position reporting regime will not only complement Hong Kong’s robust short-selling regulatory framework but will also provide a more complete picture of short-selling activities in our market.”
Under the proposed regime, the reporting obligation will be triggered if a short position is equal to or exceeds, 0.02% of the issued share capital of a listed company, or a market value of $30 million, whichever is lower. Weekly reports must be submitted to the SFC until the short position falls below both trigger levels. The SFC will publish aggregated short positions of each stock on an anonymous basis a week later.
The proposed short-position reporting regime will only be applicable to constituent stocks of the Hang Seng Index, the H-shares Index, financial stocks and other stocks specified by the SFC. Derivatives will not be included.
The new reporting model will be implemented by a new subsidiary legislation, on which the SFC will be consulting the public in due course.
The consultation paper conclusions reached by the SFC are sad in that they really did not address the issue of the cost of the information that is going to be provided and whether that cost will be of any benefit to Hong Kong. If the rules were in place tomorrow a short position of more than HK16m (just over US2m) in Esprit Holdings (essentially a fashion brand) would need to be reported each week to the HK SFC. The SFC would aggregate the reports and publish them after on an aggregated basis.
The world will clearly be a much safer place with well known fashion brands safe from nasty short sellers and industry participants will pay a tax on their operations to report positions and keep our world peachy.
It must be remembered that Hong Kong already has a strong and functioning short selling process and short selling was not an issue that effected Hong Kong in any adverse way during the financial crisis.
This is not the SFC's finest hour and we hope that future changes are given a bit more thought than this one.
Legislation will be needed and it will take time for that to be drafted and passed.
