Site Meter

Welcome to ComplianceAsia News

We aim to offer all of the latest developments we think are relevant to compliance professionals dealing with issues in financial regulation with a focus on the Asian region. Many of the articles are from the US and the UK because these are the principal locations that effect how firms operate in Asia outside of the regulator that is closest to your Asian operation.

Entries in White and Case (2)

Friday
Nov272009

Time to give thanks?

It is of course Thanksgiving in the United States and we wish our American cousins a very nice weekend with family and friends.  I was lucky enough to experience a US family Thanksgiving a few years ago when I was in stuck in the US on business.  My colleague had no hesitation in welcoming me to his home and I got the turkey and pumpkin etc.  Its a great thing for a foreigner to experience and is really at the heart of the American ethos of welcoming friends and respecting what has come before you.

But in financial services outside of the US things are not looking great on the regulatory front and I could not say that it is a time to give thanks.

Last night I attended a very good seminar that Ernst & Young hosted on the hedge fund industry.

James Walker from Clifford Chance gave an update on the European directive that has been causing so much angst.  The current game of ping pong between the moderately pro business Swedish President of the EU Council and the pro taxes and pro big government French rapporteur to the EU Parliament continues with changes back and forth on issues like whether firms need a presence in the EU to market, what types of tax arrangements will be in place with offshore centers (including Hong Kong and Singapore), whether short selling and borrowing will be contrained and whether compensation will be dictated by Brussels. 

The directive is simply a protectionist and tax grab attacking an industry that is poorly understood by the general populace in the EU.

Probably the only bright light is that European politics are such a joke that it may well take them quite a while to get anything done (my view, not James').

AIMA continues to try and represent the interests of the alternative community in relation to this issue and they are to be commended for doing so.  The proposed rules are nonsense and do neither the European voting public nor the international financial sector any service.

On the US side, Sharon Hartline from White & Case spoke about the current state of US financial services legislation and in particular that legislation from the point of view of foreign fund managers.  Many bills have been put before the US Congress over the last 12 months but two are most relevant, one from Rep Kanjorski and one from Sen Dodd.

Rep Kanjorski's bill gives a lot of discretionary power to the SEC that will affect foreign fund managers.  If it becomes law, and that is not certain at all, then we would hope that the SEC exercise some constraint in rules interpretation in so far as defining things like 'client'.  It would be easy for the SEC to define client in such a way as to compel literally hundreds of overseas firms to register with them or provide other data to them.  This is very costly to those firms and indeed presents a considerable risk to the SEC that they will be regulating entities that they practically have no control (or very little control) over due to the bulk of their presence being outside the USA.  Careful common sense is needed here and a proper cost benefit analysis should be undertaken.

Sen Dodd's bill is more complex than simply dealing with fund manager registrations and it would seem logical that his bill may take some time to move through the legislative process whatever its merits or otherwise.

Lastly Stephen Po, the SFC Director of Intermediaries Supervision and the recently appointed Chairman of the IOSCO Standing Committee 3 (SC3) on Regulation of Market Intermediaries, spoke on the regulatory outlook for Hong Kong.  Stephen talked about the current system working well and there being no desire to change the existing system in any material way.  For that we do give thanks.

However as this writer expressed during the seminar, the issues with Hong Kong regulation are more granular.  The rules and laws are good, they are not ideal.  There are 'quirks' to the rules.  Definitions that could be refined, forms that could be reviewed, processes that are not relevant to some firms.  Just because the system is broadly good does not mean that it cannot be improved.

Hong Kong has an opportunity to enhance its global attractiveness to financial industry players.  As various parts of the world become less attractive, Hong Kong can leverage its rule of law, its proximity to the rest of China and the hard working nature of its work force to take a greater slice of the global financial pie.

Now speaking of pie, Happy Thanksgiving.

 

Friday
Oct232009

Japanese regulator takes action on the sale of securities

We extracted the information below from White & Case.  White & Case have an impressive Tokyo legal practice supporting a large number of major financial firms.  We thought the information would be relevant to a number of our readers not already subscribed to their service.  If you want to get their information please visit their website.

Following our recent alert concerning sanctions on improper securities solicitations by firms registered as investment advisors in Japan, on October 20, 2009 the Tokai Local Finance Bureau ("TLFB") issued another administrative disposition against Diamond Office K.K. ("Diamond Office"), a registered investment advisor.
 
The disposition indicates Diamond Office solicited the sale of tokumei kumiai ("TK") interests to at least five investors in the period from early May 2009 to June 3, 2009 and thereafter executed a TK agreement with at least one of them. The TLFB noted that such solicitation activity requires registration as a Type II Financial Instruments Business Dealer and was improper.
 
As a result, the TLFB concluded that Diamond Office's activities are in violation of Article 29 of FIEL (the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law provision that requires persons soliciting paragraph 2 securities to have a Type II FIB registration) and imposed sanctions in the form of (i) a business suspension order of three months, and (ii) a business improvement order requiring Diamond Office to improve its compliance awareness and customer protection policies.
 
Following closely after the ISO case briefed in our prior alert, the Diamond Office case suggests that Japanese regulators are focusing their attention on ensuring that registered investment advisors conduct their regulated businesses strictly within the scope of activities permitted to investment advisors and refrain from securities solicitation activities of any sort.
 
We will continue to monitor this enforcement initiative and issue supplemental alerts as needed.